Brock v dpp 1993 case
WebP. v. Brock, California Court of Appeals 2006. Receive free daily summaries of new opinions from the California Court of Appeal. Subscribe WebJul 6, 1993 · Brock v Director of Public Prosecutions - Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Glidewell and Mr Justice Cresswell), 2 July 1993 Paul Magrath , Barrister …
Brock v dpp 1993 case
Did you know?
WebBritish and Irish Legal Information Institute WebWords in statutes may be designed to cover all possible contingencies in which case the meaning becomes extremely broad as in Brock v DPP [1993], the phrase: ‘any dog of …
WebOmni Agent Solutions WebMay 18, 2024 · (Jamaica) The DPP successfully applied for a voluntary bill after the resident magistrate had discharged the defendant on the ground that having heard the evidence, …
WebJun 5, 2024 · Brock v DPP (23 July 1993) In the Dangerous Dogs Act (1991 S.I.) ... Duport Steel v Sirs (1980) The use of the literal rule is illustrated by the case of Fisher v Bell (1960). The Restriction of ... WebJun 8, 2024 · The Brock v DPP (1993) case is an example of this. Section 1 of Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 states that “this section applies to any dog of the type known as the pit …
WebTable of Cases [References are to paragraph numbers] [“SPO” refers to Specific Penalties and Orders] ... B v Gould and DPP (1993) 67 A Crim R 297 Baglin v JG [2014] NSWSC 902 Bannister v ... Brock v United States of America [2007] FCAFC 3 C C v DPP [1996] AC 1 ...
WebThis phrase is not defined in the 1971 Act. However, the same phrase was used in the law prior to 1971 (the Malicious Damage Act 1861), and old cases ruled that even slight damage was sufficient to prove damage. For example, in Gayford v Chouler (1898) 1 QB 316, trampling down grass was held to be damage. The cases prior to the Criminal Damage ... good rsi numberWebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Brock v DPP (1993), Cheeseman v DPP (1990), R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892) and more. ... The need for Statutory Interpretation One of the problems in this case was that meanings of words can change over the years. R v Judge of the City of London Court (1892) chest of drawers sale tampa flWebMar 23, 2015 · Words in statutes may be designed to cover all possible contingencies in which case the meaning becomes extremely broad as in Brock v DPP [1993], the phrase: 'any dog of the type known as the pit bull terrier' in … chest of drawers salisburyWebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Brock v DPP 1993, Cheeseman v DPP 1990, Royal College of Nursing v DHSS 1981 and more. ... Law … goodr sunbathing with wizardsWebFeb 16, 2012 · in many cases there is a dispute over meaning of a word or phrase in a statute; requires judges to determine exact meaning of particular word or phrase; ... Brock v DPP (1993) confusion over wording of Dangerous Dogs Act 1991; whether type and breed meant the same; Changes in the use of language; goodr sunglasses basset houndWebJul 2, 1993 · Case Law; R v Knightsbridge Crown Court, ex parte Dunne ; Brock v DPP. Judgment Cited authorities 5 Cited in Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Jurisdiction: ... goodr sunglasses at reiWebIn Brock v DPP 1993 this was the key point in dispute and the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court decided that ‘ type ’ had a wider meaning than ‘breed’. It could cover dogs that were not pedigree pit bull terriers, but had a substantial number of … goodr sports sunglasses