WebMERLIN M. MAGALLONA v. EDUARDO ERMITA, GR No. 187167, 2011-08-16. Facts: In 1961, Congress passed Republic Act No. 3046 (RA 3046)[2] demarcating the maritime baselines of the Philippines as an archipelagic State.[3] This law followed the framing of the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous. WebPreliminary-Quiz - Read online for free. RIzal. 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful
Magallona vs. Ermita – LAW I.Q.
WebMar 4, 2024 · Magallona v. Ermita 2024-03-04 administrator G.R No. 187167 August 16, 2011 CARPIO, J.: Facts: Congress passed RA 3046 in 1961 demarcating the maritime baselines of the Philippines as an archipelagic State, This is pursuant to the framing of the Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone in 1958 UNCLOS I and … WebJun 16, 2024 · MAGALLONA VS ERMITA - BVR & ASSOCIATES a collections of case digests and laws that can help aspiring law students to become a lawyer MAGALLONA … goldie hawn dead or alive
Philippine Territorial Limits and Disputes
WebMagallona and ors v Ermita and ors, Petition for certiorari and prohibition, GR no 187167, ILDC 2758 (PH 2011), 16th July 2011, Philippines; Supreme Court Date: 16 July 2011 Content type: Domestic court decisions Jurisdiction: Philippines [ph]; Supreme Court Citation (s): GR no 187167 (Other Reference) ILDC 2758 (PH 2011) (OUP reference) Product: WebOct 21, 2024 · Magallona v. Ermita, G.R. No. 187167, July 16, 2011 Doctrine: RA 9522 did not decrease the demarcation of Ph territory and is merely a statutory tool to establish the country’s maritime zone and continental shelves to comply with UNCLOS. WebAug 14, 2016 · Challenging the constitutionality of RA 9522, Dean Merlin Magallona, Atty. Harry Roque, Rep. Riza Hontiveros along with 38 students from UP College of Law came to the Supreme Court to argue that the said law violated the constitution as it diminishes our territory since it does not include territories formerly included in the delineation of the … head buds